MOBILITY PLAN SURVEY FOR PARENTSSurvey name (ID): ENQUETE AUPRES DES 
      PARENTS POUR LE TRANSPORT (47535)
        Date submitted submitdate2012-04-24 16:44:02
            Questionnaire
            Child's lastname, firstname and class
            LastnameMackenzie
            FirstnameBruno
            ClassMaternelle II Carnavali
            MONDAY - OUTWARD JOURNEY CAR [32]
            MONDAY - RETURN JOURNEY AT 4.30PM CAR [32]
            TUESDAY - OUTWARD JOURNEY CAR [32]
            TUESDAY - RETURN JOURNEY AT 1PM CAR [32]
            WEDNESDAY - OUTWARD JOURNEY CAR [32]
            WEDNESDAY - RETURN JOURNEY AT 1PM CAR [32]
            THURSDAY - OUTWARD JOURNEY CAR [32]
            THURSDAY - RETURN JOURNEY AT 1PM CAR [32]
            FRIDAY - OUTWARD JOURNEY CAR [32]
            FRIDAY - RETURN JOURNEY AT 1PM CAR [32]
            Comments I have already commented on the fact that I believe the 
            vertical split has given rise to unlawful discrimination and serious 
            child welfare issues. The public transport issue is irrelevant to 
            parents like me who have maternelle and primary children. Those 
            children will have to be accompanied to school by private car as it 
            would be irresponsible and unlawful to entrust them to a mixed age 
            range bus with one adult supervisor. I think the school should be 
            honest and acknowledge that there will be no acceptable transport 
            provision for those young children who, I believe, make up the 
            majority of Lux II pupils. The only acceptable future for Mamer is 
            as a secondary school and, as such, it is more likely to obtain the 
            systemm of ramassage scolaire that parents of secondary children are 
            asking for. The economics of scale would also make it possible for a 
            Lux I primary in Kirchberg and a Lux II secondary in Mamer to offer 
            a decent range of language sections. Gordon Mackenzie