Home Blog Page 28

An ASBL to defend equal school rights for European institution staff

The European School Non-Discrimination Campaign has raised the issues with the Luxembourg Equality Authority, but it refuses to recognise the category of language discrimination. We have raised them with the Office of the Ombudsman for Children, but they have looked away, claiming it is beyond their jurisdiction. We have raised it with the Commission, which has pointed the finger at the Luxembourg representative in the Board of Governors. We have raised it with the unions, but they are unable or unwilling to take a strong stance on the matter: the representatives are divided due to disinterest and the vested interests of those who have children at Lux I or property near Mamer. We have raised the issues with the parent-teacher association, but that is in general disarray and has become hopelessly compromised.

Clearly there is a need for an independent association to represent the interests of parents and children who have been adversely affected by the school’s discriminatory policy. This association should reach out, not only to Lux II parents, but also to the many families whose children have been forced out of the school and who are now burdened with extra costs and inconvenience as a result. Many Lux I parents have also been prejudiced by the mismanagement and deteriorating standards and options offered by the school and are also seeking alternatives to the European School system.

European School system-A System Perfectly Designed to Fail

The current organisation of the school could not have been better designed to fail. Parents with the youngest children are the worst affected and most likely to seek and find manageable alternatives. Those children now being registered at alternative schools will be lost to the European School system for good. With low registration at this earliest level, that scarcity of children will affect all age levels in the school within five years. The German section is the first to go. Diminishing child numbers means that other subject options will disappear steadily. What next? School fees for institution staff, to help sustain a costly campus that fewer people want?

The attempt by the school to boost registration by forcing all EN/FR/DE children to use LUX II, rather than dealing with the discrimination, will accelerate the decline of Lux II and Lux I. It is an act of desperation and an acknowledgment that the planning to date has been utterly misconceived. Many parents have made, and are continuing to make expensive decisions to move what they believe are Lux I catchment areas, but which will not be in the near future. How long will EU staff have to put up with this chopping and changing of enrollment policies? Will they be compensated for the pointless residential and mortgage decisions they have made on the basis of their legitimate expectations?

Privileged group

The other obvious question is if Lux I is now going to cater only for a small, privileged group of Baltic Rim countries. What are they going to do with all the unused school space? How viable is that? And if Lux I will have no vehicular language section, how will that affect the teaching of second languages there?

Parents will be parents and they will put welfare and education at the top of their agenda, even if the European School does not. Those parents will continue to look for child centred, family friendly alternatives, no matter how hard the school authorities try to bully them into accepting their divisive, discriminatory agenda.

Contrast this with the horizontal split alternative

All parents would be offered manageable early learning facilities near their place of work, regardless of their nationality. Those children would be safer, have more sleep and family contact. Also would be treated equally and would grow up together within the European School system. Then, approaching their teenage years, it would be natural for them to stay with their school friends and make the leap, together, and on an equal basis, to a secondary facility with attractive subject options in Mamer. As older children can travel by themselves, no family would have to make costly and life diminishing moves into the commuter belt. There would be no need for constant changes to the enrolment policy to try to prop up dead-end, discriminatory policies.

Opting out of European school Luxembourg II

The attractiveness of Luxembourg lies in its compactness, enabling residents to easily reach their destinations such as schools, workplaces, and city amenities. This convenience is available to parents and children at Lux I, but unfortunately not to those at Lux II. Lux I parents can even have lunch with their children at work, which Lux II parents are unable to do. Over time, Lux II parents question the reasons behind being treated differently in terms of commuting due to their language. In various aspects of life, Lux II families face numerous challenges. Even the children attending the Garderie there are deprived of supervised transportation or school buses in the morning, as the CPE staff is not instructed to wait for them at the bus stop, unlike nursery or primary teachers.

For many Lux II parents, the lack of convenience and support in their daily routines has become increasingly frustrating. Unlike Lux I parents, they are unable to have lunch with their children at work and feel excluded from the close-knit community that proximity brings. As time goes on, the differences in treatment between Lux I and Lux II families become more apparent and the sense of being targeted based on language becomes more pronounced. The challenges faced by Lux II families permeate various aspects of their lives, making their daily routines feel difficult and unmanageable. Even simple tasks, such as transportation for their children, are complicated by the lack of supervision and support provided by the CPE staff, leaving Lux II parents feeling increasingly isolated and excluded.

It’s becoming increasingly frustrating for many Lux II parents who lack convenience and support in their daily routines. Unlike Lux I parents, they can’t have lunch with their children at work and feel excluded from the close-knit community. The differences in treatment between Lux I and Lux II families become more apparent over time, intensifying the sense of being targeted based on language. These challenges affect various aspects of Lux II families’ lives, making daily routines difficult and unmanageable. Even simple tasks like transportation for their children are complicated by the lack of supervision and support from CPE staff, leaving Lux II parents feeling isolated and excluded.

This is why those parents are now opting to transfer their children to child-centered state and private schools in Germany, France, Belgium and Luxembourg, including the International School, St. Georges and the Vauban. Other private schools, such as Over the Rainbow and Maria Montessouri are expanding in order to cater for the exodus of those Lux II parents with young children. One consequence of this is that Lux II is increasingly a ghetto for those nationalities who do not have public or private alternatives for education in their national language. It is fast establishing itself as an undesirable facility for lower paid EU staff from the south east of Europe and Category II and III pupils, for whom it is cheaper than the private schools.

The lack of supervision and support from the CPE staff at Lux II complicates even simple tasks like transportation for children. As a result, parents are choosing to transfer their children to child-centered schools in Germany, France, Belgium, and Luxembourg, such as the International School, St. Georges, and the Vauban. Private schools like Over the Rainbow and Maria Montessouri are also expanding to accommodate the influx of Lux II parents seeking alternatives. Consequently, Lux II is becoming a concentrated hub for nationalities without public or private education options in their native language. It is increasingly seen as an undesirable institution for lower-paid EU staff from southeastern Europe and Category II and III students who find it more affordable than private schools.

The multiple layers of discrimination and national resentment developing at Lux II make it a concrete monument to everything the EU was supposed to be against.

Will it take a fatality before the authorities acknowledge that the school campus was not designed for young children?

Unlike last year, the discrimination is not abstract any more:

(i) All the extra commuting, the lost sleep, the resulting poor behaviour and poor learning, the complete lack of contact with the school, the unfair transport charges and the general bureaucratic mismanagement of the school are concrete problems that have to be faced every day. There has been a general decline in standards, with teachers’ time eaten into by increased surveillance and supervision duties. The recent revelation of the poor, sugary food being offered to children in Lux II is symptomatic of the indifferent ethos of the administration. Children are not the cherished core of the school system, but a problem to be controlled and contained with an ever-thickening, ever-changing rulebook that is applied or ignored at the whim of the school authorities.images

(ii) The accidents have started, due to multiple, deep stairwells and other design flaws. The external and internal staircases are so patently dangerous that they require permanent supervision. Other injuries have been caused by the gravel in many areas of the campus which, although illegally located on a protected Natura site, has hardly a single patch grass. Some accidents go unreported, with tired parents being faced with barely legible accident forms in French. Will it take a fatality before the authorities acknowledge that the school campus was not designed for young children?

(iii) Parents are being pressurised by circumstances to expose their children to increasing levels of risk: to allow their young children to travel unaccompanied on public transport; to make their way alone from study centre to periscolaire activities and back again in the dark, between badly lit, badly monitored buildings and open spaces on the verge of a marsh. If that is safe, why are parents required to sign a form exempting the after care services from liability for anything that may happen? Is the Ombudsman for Children aware of this arrangement?

(iv) Apart from the structural and transport dangers, one has to point out that paedophilia is a fact and, few as they may be, paedophiles are drawn to places where unaccompanied children congregate. Lux II primary children are being asked to run much higher risks in that regard than Lux I or national primary school children.

(v) Weeks after the school opened plans were unveiled for a huge housing estate behind the school, previously concealed from parents and their representatives. This is how EU staff and their young children and EU public funding are being used to promote the private interests of private developers. Parents who obeyed the school’s orders, that they had to become commuters and pay inflated house prices in order to avail of public schooling, now face negative equity – on top of all the other disadvantages of speaking the wrong language.

Enrollment of new pupils to European school Lux I and Lux II

0

Enrollment of new pupils to European schools Lux I and Lux II will take place from 15. April 2013 to 31. May 2013.

Will new pupils for vehicular sections (EN, FR, DE) automatically be enrolled in Lux II?